Name: Jennifer Brezina
Research Title: Student Success in English 103
In the space below, present your research
question: that is, what did you want to discover from your classroom
project?
Will providing students with personalized
feedback on their MLA style and research skills and recommendations for
review materials early in the course improve their performance in these
areas on the first essay?
In the space below, present a summary of your
research project (approximately 500-1000 words), including a general
description of the scope and nature of your project, the design or the
outline that you followed. Include objectives, activities, timelines,
data collection procedures, evaluation methodology, and/or benchmarks
that provided progress measures for your project.
English 101 is a prerequisite for English 103,
but, for a variety of reasons, many students enter English 103 online having
not completely mastered the skills taught in English 101, limiting their
success, especially on early assignments. Of particular concern are skills
in the areas of research and documentation.
In this project, I proposed that by having students assessed (both
self-assessment and objective assessment) early in the course and then
providing them with resources tailored to their specific needs to assist
them with review of this 101-level material, the students will be more
successful in English 103.
As part of the required online orientation (taking place in the first two
days of the semester), my online English 103 students completed a quiz
through Blackboard that asked them for their own assessment of their mastery
of the research and documentation skills taught in English 101 as well as
asking them to answer objective questions relating to those skills to
measure their current areas of strength and weakness. Students received
immediate scores and feedback through Blackboard (see attachment 1 for
questions and results)*.
Additionally, by the end of the first week of class, I emailed each student
with an individualized list of resources designed to help them review in the
areas in which they show weakness (for a sample, see attachment 2)*. The
resources consisted largely of online exercises and other self-paced
presentations and handouts (see attachment 3)*.
At the time that the first essay was due (approximately four weeks into the
course), students were asked to complete a survey that asked them about
their usage of these review materials. They were also asked to approximate
the amount of time spent in each area and also to rate their satisfaction
with the resources. If they chose not to spend time with the review
materials, they were be asked for their reasons (see attachment 3 for survey
results)*.
After grading the first assignment, I tallied the number of errors in MLA
style formatting and source documentation as well as the number and types of
sources used. I then compared these results to those from two previous
semesters’ English 103 classes that have not gone through this process
(Spring and Fall 2005) (see attachment 4)*.
Briefly describe any modifications to your original
research proposal.
No significant modifications. The tracking
feature did not work as anticipated, so I had to rely on student reports of
how long they spent with review materials.
What did you (as an instructor) learn from your
research, and in what way(s) will your future students benefit from this
research?
I noticed a significant decrease in errors in
MLA style. For example, in Fall 2005, 11 of 14 students did not format the
heading of the essay correctly, but in Spring 2006 only 5 of 17 had errors
in that area. More students also used appropriate library sources (such as
Proquest) as support in their essays.
Some areas did not improve as much as I anticipated, though. For instance,
students still struggled with finding reliable Internet sites to use as
sources, and the overall grades on the essays were not significantly better
(see attachment 5 for full results).
I will continue to use this type of early assessment and response in future
classes and make review materials available to students. I will likely
revise the questions to target the areas that were still weak in the Spring
2006 essays. It does seem from these results that the best outcomes came
with skills that were fairly mechanical (MLA style formatting, Works Cited
entries, using Proquest) as opposed to those involving more critical
thinking (evaluating Internet sources).
In the future, I may be interested in using this technique to target skills
that involve more critical thinking.
I would also be interested in exploring the use of different types of
feedback -- computer scored vs. personal email from instructor. In this
study I used both methods, so it is not clear if one or the other (or a
combination of the two) led to the result.
* Attachments available upon request